What Do Modern Artists Think of Art School Confidential
Art Pic Motion picture About An Artist At Art School ...Whoa!
Yesterday I went to my local art theater to sentry an fine art film about a future creative person attending art school. Whew! I'thousand glad I got that out!
Merely lets chat about this art picture, shall we? Here nosotros get...
It's got a lot going for it. First and foremost is an impressive script. Obviously the screenwriter, manager, producer (or all three) attended fine art school at some point. And making fun of the people and faculty at such a identify is where the one-act in Art School Confidential takes wing. When Jerome (Max Minghella), the main character, begins attending his freshman yr at Strathmore Art School, he'southward chop-chop introduced to the platitude-riddled cast (the platitude is purposeful and pulled off just equally well as the picture show Milky way QUEST). He meets the burned-out art teacher Professor Sandiford (John Malkovich), the beautiful model that every male wants named Audrey (Sophia Myles), the angry lesbian, the teacher'due south pet/osculation-a$$, the drug addled picture show pupil, and a splash of others. In that location'south also a strangler on the loose in the neighborhood which will play a vital part in how Jerome'south artistic dreams play out.
The ridiculousness of fine art schoolhouse is what really makes this movie piece of work. Jerome is plain very talented, merely other artists whiz by him considering art is what the artists say art is. Information technology might exist a picture of a car, or a man attaching jumper cables to his nipples and letting current run through him, or a mound of plastic chairs.
Jerome wants to exist the adjacent Picasso. He studies hard, tries to get noticed, just nothing seems to work. He'due south also a virgin and wants desperately to go laid but with the wacked out student torso at Strathmore, he'south got his piece of work cut out for him.
As Jerome works and works, trying to go a successful creative person, nosotros get to watch him fall into despair; he starts smoking, drinking, and visits a washed up Strathmore graduate named Jimmy (Jim Broadbent) who gives him some night and grotesquely sage advice: "Are you lot good at 'getting on your knees?'" (I've cleaned that up a flake, only yous get the thought.) It becomes apparent to Jerome (and the movie watcher) that he has no chance of becoming a recognized artist ...unless something drastic happens. Which, of course, information technology does (Cliche? Oh yes!) Once this "something desperate" happens, Jerome learns the true nature of being an artist. It'southward an unfortunate and incredibly funny set of circumstances that finally thrusts Jerome into the limelight.
The level of casting in this indie film is surprisingly big and notable. In addition to John Malkovich (Being JOHN MALKOVICH) we run across Anjelica Huston (THE ROYAL TENENBAUMS), Jim Broadbent (MOULIN ROUGE!), Matt Keeslar (DUNE miniseries), Ethan Suplee (COLD Mount), Steve Buscemi (THE Large LEBOWSKI) and several others.
This impressive cast pulled off the overly-pretentious attitudes that flood many art schools. They were witty nevertheless cynical which made laughing out loud a requirement during the viewing of this amazing lilliputian flick.
God I honey these little independents when they're done right!
63 out of 77 constitute this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Another scathingly funny comedy collaboration of Zwigoff & Clowes.
Alarm: Spoilers
ART School CONFIDENTIAL (2006) *** Max Minghella, Sophia Myles, Matt Keeslar, John Malkovich, Jim Broadbent, Anjelica Huston, Steve Buscemi, Joel Moore, Ethan Suplee, Nick Swardson, Adam Scott.
Some other scathingly funny one-act collaboration of Zwigoff & Clowes.
Although I take never read whatsoever of Daniel Clowes' comic books/graphic novels I know I've definitely lived them. His scathingly, biting satire and caustically witty characters are indelibly familiar with my train of thought in sense of humour and I accept known some of those gross caricatures to exist actual flesh & claret people. Archetypes of angst & anomie, pseudo intellectuals and confront it, assholes. There I said information technology but then again and then does Clowes and filmmaker/collaborator/partner-in- law-breaking Terry Zwigoff who are dorsum together since their last corking teamwork try "Ghost Earth".
Adapting his story Clowes perfectly captures the ennui of being a talented creative person trying to find himself and be taken seriously in a sea of misfits, miscreants and malcontents. The talented creative person here is one Jerome Platz (Minghella, son of filmmaker Anthony Minghella, and disturbingly looking like the teenage version of the comic strip character "Dondi" (!)), a lonely, lowly freshman embarking to find his true talent every bit an creative person by enrolling at a prestigious New York art college called Strathmore where he rooms on campus with vulgarian film student Vince (Suplee) and mincing ambivalently gay manner designer wannabe Matthew (Swardson) and pines for his drawing class' nude model Audrey Baumgartner (Myles, a combo of Cameron Diaz and Uma Thurman; yep, definitely easy on the eyes kids!), who he idealizes and imagines her to be his destined love and inspired muse. Oh and in that location's a serial strangler on the loose.
Manager Zwigoff lets the jokes get broad and the wit stream like unleashed venom with its nasty student body and officious artistes-in-the-making (they're all there as they are pointed out hilariously past eternal drib-out slacker Bardo whose medium is sarcasm) are only as well existent to be caricatured with the pomposity of greatness and those who deign it so including Professor Sandiford (Malkovich at his most passive-aggressive) and local art goon restaurateur Broadway Bob (an unbilled Buscemi) equally well as Broadbent as a slovenly, drunk alum who once had the potential to be the 'adjacent big thing' is a anarchism. Perhaps the must cut to the bone and too painful to exist honest depiction of art equally success is a symposium with Strathmore's prized alum and sensation to the art world Marvin Sagemiller (Scott) who basks in his misanthropy and embracing his assholedness.
Zwigoff and Clowes make a perfect combination even if the subplot is superfluous and unnecessary providing an unbalanced final deed that suggest what would've been the coda to Travis Bickle in "Taxi Driver". However its previous moments outweigh the outcome by merely stating that fine art is what it is and that's all that at that place is.
12 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Coming of age gone incorrect.
For the first 30 minutes, 'Art School Confidential' sets itself upwards as a coming of age movie. But instead of at that pivotal moment when one comes of age, Jerome the aspiring artist turns to the night side and begins to show someone with 18-carat ambition and a worthy character descend into a turbulent test of artistic innovation. Whatever the hell that means. 'Art School' not but depicts the private growth of Jerome, but as well analyzes the definition of art, and in some respects, defines it quite well. Why does shitty fine art get and then much acclaim? Why does quality art often go unnoticed? Why are artists such pretentious ass holes? The whole motion-picture show answers all these questions hilariously and beautifully.
36 out of 43 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
This film impressed the hell out of me
I came into this film expecting a hateful, rude comedy in the vein of Zwigoff'southward previous endeavour Bad Santa (a picture which has more brains than information technology gets credit for). For the first iii/four or so of the film, that's what I got, and I enjoyed every second. Towards the last fleck, the film takes a turn darker than y'all would expect. This sudden twist, unexpected as it was, did non feel trite or convoluted. More fascinating.
Make no mistake this a nighttime one-act in the truest definition. In that location is something well-nigh the ending that is supremely haunting.
Ethan Suplee provides the hyper-actively ambitious function he has become beloved for. Malkovich does not disappoint equally the burnt-out and oh-and so-total-of-crap fine art professor. Jim Broadbent channels Chuck Bukowski hither equally he barks like a pit-bull and alternately purrs similar a tabby as the disheveled failed artist/ nihilistic mentor of our boy Jerome, who just may be the only unpretentious and truly talented pupil at Strathmore University. Throw in Anjelica Huston and Steve Buscemi in delightfully understated roles, a string of murders courtesy of the mythical Strathmore Strangler, and the positively stunning Sophia Myles as the nude drawing course model Audrey who becomes both the object of Jerome's affection and the source of his disillusion, and yous have got a dysfunctional masterpiece.
71 out of 94 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Art class
Alarm: Spoilers
Jerome, the swain at the middle of this story, changes his suburban existence for the art scene beingness taught at Strathmore's, a place that should exist avoided like the plague. Jerome, who has been the butt of all the bullies in suburbia soon discovers the big city is not exactly prepared to take him, or his art.
Jerome is an insecure young homo who learns apace his art professors see things in a different way, every bit is the instance with Mr. Sandiford, an artist himself, who tries to discourage the young people in his class at any given moment. In a way, Sandiford, who is also a mediocre painter, can't stand the competition of the bright new would exist artists that he is supposed to teach and mold.
The beau becomes entranced by a beautiful young female model, Audrey, who doesn't realize she is the object of Jerome's affections. Since he is not attracting whatsoever compliments from the teacher, Jerome decides to accept some of the eccentric Jimmy's drawings to make collages and nowadays them as his own, without any positive reaction from anyone. He is likewise instrumental in the burn that consumes the dilapidated building in which Jimmy lives.
Terry Zwigoff, whose previous films accept dealt with off shell characters in films such as "Crumb", and "Ghost Life", doesn't quite brand it with his have on Jerome. Working with his screen writer, Daniel Clowes, he doesn't quite pull it off.
Max Minghella plays Jerome, the potential creative person who doesn't seem to believe in his own talent. Best affair in the film is John Malkevich, who plays Sandiford, with perfect pitch. Jim Broadbent is perfect equally Jimmy, a man who has given upwards on his art and on life. Sophie Myles is an enigma every bit Audrey considering she seems lifeless in her role.
One can merely wish Terry Zwigoff better luck next fourth dimension.
eight out of 11 establish this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Exactly what yous would expect from Zwigoff - which is too its weakness
Terry Zwigoff fabricated 1 of my favorite movies - Ghost Earth. This one can be considered a sequel of sorts. Except, it's backwards: instead of commiserating with the young adult "misfits" in the world of "normal" people, it now laughs and satirizes them in a setting where their greatest concentration can be found - an art schoolhouse in New York. In a farce-like setup it goes from student to educatee and ridicules them for all the "non-conformity" clichés that they are, while staying fully aware of being one large platitude itself - and landing the mandatory slaps on the "suburbia" and the "normal world" besides.
But this is where it fails: it lacks any subtlety. What was great about Ghost World, what was its chief superiority over Art School Confidential, is that it had plenty subtlety to stay an engaging, deep picture, while this comes off more like a picture-for-fun. It's equally if Zwigoff decided to practise exactly what'southward expected of him and serve it in a transparent glass box for people similar me - who would enjoy the picture show tremendously nonetheless, but regret everything it'south so obviously missing. Oh - and unfortunately for me, I felt like much of the "fine art-school" topic has already been depicted very well very recently, in the HBO's 6 Feet Under.
50 out of 71 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
very funny
I don't sympathize why this movie has attracted negative reviews. When I saw it the audition - including me - was laughing out loud. Sure, information technology isn't the cleverest motion picture ever but it is unfailingly entertaining. The performances are great and the script is witty. The indicate is that Jerome tin draw but is no great creative person so from the start is never going to achieve his appetite to exist Picasso. He is equally much of a stereotype as everybody else. It is stated right from the first that everybody is a cliché - and ain't that the truth? Nosotros are all clichés. Equally Malkovich explains in the offset art students are almost guaranteed disappointment. The audience isn't supposed to sympathise with Jerome - if you think y'all are then you have missed the betoken.
42 out of 60 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
To everyone who thinks it turned dark...
I recall that those who felt the movie started as an excellent parody of art schools only so failed by turning dark, you've missed the point. By turning dark, y'all outset to fear for the main graphic symbol only to be confronted past the fact that the art world is and then ridiculous, it will laud anyone for the most insane reasons. Jerome's art was considered boring until he wasn't. It's not that the movie turned night...information technology had to go in that management to reach the ultimate parody.
Every bit someone who is regularly disappointed by what passes for art today, it was refreshing to see this confronted in such an open loonshit. It's a disappointment that people without skills accept succeeded-- and that fine art is the but discipline where professors are afraid to give out poor grades. I certainly experienced this in my art days. Students who put in the endeavour and failed to complete the requirements would nonetheless receive a good form considering they'd put in the endeavor.
This film is fantastic because information technology goes to the extreme to comment on art today.
48 out of 65 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Great cast, just not quite a skillful movie
We saw this dark comedy at Sundance (SLC showing). I wanted very much to give this a totally positive review, but information technology's simply so disjointed that it was hard to decide what it was trying to say. The bandage is terrific: John Malkovic, Anjelica Huston, Jim Broadbent, Sophie Myles, among others. There are a lot of things that are funny in this film, and we did express mirth. But the storyline is all over the identify. I read an interview with the director (who didn't come for Q & A later this one), and he said the storyline has a lot to do with his fear of New York, along with his fascination for it. The NYC shown in this flick is very scary; I don't recall I'd ever even want to visit it, much less desire to alive there! The pic skewers a lot of snooty fine art types, and in that arena, it works. However, the 2d half of the picture just didn't quite work for me. The firsthalf of the picture show was amusing, but when it turned extremely dark in the terminal act, information technology just didn't experience right. Information technology's too bad, because I recall it'due south great fun to skewer the snooty art earth...simply this was just too far over the top.
56 out of 105 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A keen, contemptuous one-act almost the art globe.
What can I say? I always considered that art- as in paintings, drawings and such- was a very complicated thing to follow. I hateful, you see a painting, you let information technology be absorbed into your consciousness, yous reflect about it, and and so you decide nearly what information technology means and whether it has whatsoever significance to you. Simply how do you know if it's actually "art"? This is why I institute Terry Zwigoff's "Fine art Schoolhouse Confidential" to be an utterly refreshing look at the art earth, which is even more than complicated than what I actually believed information technology to be. The film deals with a tranquility, lonely boy chosen Jerome Platz (Max Minghella), who has been bullied and ignored ever since he was a child. Now, Jerome's hero is Pablo Picasso, and always since he recollect he'southward wanted to exist a g creative person, like his hero. "I wanna be the greatest artist of the 21st century!," he oft squeals delightedly throughout the film.
Anyhow, lilliputian Jerome grows up, graduates from high-school and decides to enroll in a renowned art schoolhouse, where young artists whose fine art is actually new and modern can hope to make a name out of themselves. This college is a tiny simply colourful world populated with a big assortment of weird and quirky characters, all of them "artists", and in comes young, boyish, serenity Jerome trying to be an artist like all of them.
Upon entering his dorm room, he encounters his 2 roommates, a fat movie major (Ethan Suplee) working on a short picture show based on some murders that have been terrorizing the campus grounds, and a noticeably gay fashion major (Nick Swardson) who swears he misses his girlfriend.
And in his virtually important class, little Jerome meets his holier-than-yard professor (John Malkovich) who's so full of himself to actually notice any of his students' work, a flunkie (Joel David Moore) who enrolled into fine art school just for the 'pussy', and...a gorgeous, sophisticated model (Sophia Myles) who also happens to be the daughter of a famous painter and who instantly becomes Jerome's muse and obsession.
Throughout the film, which is perfectly written and refreshingly funny, we follow Jerome's steady psychological downfall. He begins as a happy and anxious boy with dreams, and he slowly progresses into a disheartened, depressed, suicidal failure of an artist. This happens because his art isn't appreciated at all, considering he notices how arbitrary and tediously unnerving the "art earth" really is, and considering his muse and obsession doesn't pay him whatever attention and prefers to mingle with a hunky, handsome new art student who as well becomes the number 1 artist in school and who's "fine art" (if it can even be chosen that) Jerome loathes to a higher place anything else.
Why brings me back to the initial question: how exercise yous know if something is really "art"? Through diverse hilarious and original encounters with artists, connoisseurs and art grads, Jerome begins to put two and two together and finds that this world that he then reveres is actually soul-sucking and lifeless. "It's non about how practiced you are," an art school grad (Jim Broadbent) says, "It's most how practiced you lot are at cock-sucking." Only then, but when poor Jerome is nigh to requite up on his life, his art, his everything...well, something happens that will requite him i last risk to make a name for himself, to conquer his muse and admiration and to make sense out of all the craziness he's living through.
More an ironic film that exposes "art" every bit we know information technology nowadays, this moving picture touches on the basic human feelings of failure, redemption and demand. Information technology as well talks well-nigh dear. And it'due south too very, very funny...which is proficient, because at that place is still comedy in life's tragedies, isn't there? I highly recommend this pic. Believe me, you will non be disappointed! Rating: iv stars out of 4!!
7 out of ix found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Corking picture show- fun, exciting, fascinating, and keeps yous pleasantly off balance
First off, allow me simply say how much I love Max Minghella. I saw Bee Season at a picture show festival a while dorsum and straight off knew he was going to exercise fantastic things with his career. So far he'southward proved me right.
I have been anticipating Fine art School Confidential for a long time. I establish out about information technology through the IMDb, and as a big fan of Zwigoff'southward previous piece of work, I was actually looking frontward to seeing what he was going to exercise with the fabulous bandage he had assembled (Malkovich, Huston, Buscemi, etc). The picture show did non disappoint.
The starting time of the film is about what I expected- cute, off-trounce story virtually a talented geek who goes to art school and pursues the daughter of his dreams. And then it got dark. And then it got very dark. And and then it got extremely dark. I shortly realized I had no thought where information technology was going to have me side by side, and that excited me. The 'mystery' aspect of the moving picture is brilliantly washed equally well- it keeps yous just well informed enough that you have about a 50/l adventure of figuring it out preemptively, and you'll always realize what'southward going on just when you lot need to.
I have read reviews that called Art School Confidential misanthropic, amidst other things. I disagree. It has misanthropic aspects, misanthropic characters, only overall I found that it ended on an expressly positive annotation. I absolutely loved the catastrophe. Five minutes before information technology ended, I wasn't sure how information technology was going to terminate, and that, in my opinion, is the best style to do it. Zwigoff'southward management is too very impressive. There's a singled-out divergence in the temper throughout- it starts out looking and feeling sunnier and lighter, and as Minghella'due south grapheme becomes darker, so does the look of the movie. Just one of those little things that adds to the overall experience.
Art School Confidential thoroughly covers ground that Ghost World touched on briefly- namely, the line between art and BS. Information technology is clearly a subject on which Terry Zwigoff has a lot to say, and he says it very eloquently. The bandage is great, the music is great, the direction is neat. Go run into it. And let me say again... I love Max Minghella. Here's hoping he doesn't plough to stupid teen flicks to pay the bills.
64 out of 87 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A Masterpiece
Warning: Spoilers
It's like shooting fish in a barrel to see why this movie got terrible reviews (in every sense), and continues to get them here. A reviewer, by definition, is not an creative person. This movie is a bracingly tough-minded depiction of how a person becomes an artist, and every pitfall forth that path.
Art School Confidential starts out like a satire, with a lacerating, devastating serial of portraits of all the means not-artists look, audio, deport and think. The students are spoiled narcissists, suckups, politicking weasels, imitators, or mindless followers of fashion -- all of them looking for validation outside themselves. The professors are failures who express their self contempt by becoming bullies, phony gurus, and sexual predators. And just beyond the "school" (in which no one learns annihilation) lie the leeches: the various patrons and marketers to whom art is just another product to buy and sell.
Our hero, Jerome, must navigate his mode past them all and learn to live and create without their approval or fifty-fifty their comprehension. Declining this test, the other creative person character Jimmy (beautifully played past Jim Broadbent) has become bitter, cynical, and ultimately homicidal. This is why the moving picture seems to become darker every bit its true seriousness of purpose unfolds. This isn't a satirical teen comedy… what saves Jerome is his human relationship with Audrey, but his last test as an artist is to see beyond his physical attraction to her and to finally understand her as his muse.
I've read dozens of reviews of this movie and I don't recollect I've seen the word "muse" once. Anyone who doesn't get that point, illustrated beautifully in the film's final amazing image, doesn't know what they're watching. Most movies, no matter how cynical or dark, merely want to exist loved. Art School Confidential wants to bear witness the world as it is and tell the truth virtually it. And it seems it has demonstrated its own thesis by catastrophe up as unloved and misunderstood as its protagonist.
11 out of xv constitute this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Shape of Things
Warning: Spoilers
Terry Zwigoff's films often revolve around artists. Consider "Louie Bluie", which dealt with country blues musician Howard Armstrong, or "Crumb", a macabre film produced by David Lynch which dealt with, amongst other things, the life of Robert Crub, a dysfunctional artist and illustrator who turns to art as a means of escaping emotional and physical abuse. Years later Zwigoff would direct "Ghost World", in which a young adult female struggles to become an creative person in a earth which demands pragmatism and conformity. Trouble is, our hero creative person, despite being well-meaning and beautifully idealistic, is equally vapid and smug as those she defines herself against.
And so Zwigoff's films increasingly shatter various romantic myths associated with "the artist". This is seen most conspicuously in "Art School Confidential", the tale of Jerome, a squeaky-make clean immature artist whose piece of work demonstrates impeccable (if 2d-paw) technique, but is nevertheless perceived as being devoid of personality, originality and content. Indeed, Jerome's art seems personal only when he is fawning over and sketching a immature adult female whom he is infatuated with.
In an attempt to win accolades, Jerome thus steals the "deep work" of an ostracised, morbid and hugely tortured painter (this painter's morbid art is the outcome of him existence ignored for decades past audiences). But nonetheless Jerome and his stolen art are ignored. The public, the pic goes on to say, appreciates art merely insofar as there is some consistently between how the work is perceived and how the artist as a public persona is perceived. Meanwhile, a talentless cop pretends to exist a painter and wins accolades for his unproblematic paintings. The audience loves this connect between naive paintings and a naive painter. The public wants authenticity, a lack of pretence, truth...but also sensationalism. When Jerome poses as a mass murderer his stolen paintings suddenly make him an international superstar. In other words, the worth of his paintings only went upward when extrinsic factors came into play: the belief that Jerome had hidden, undercover, dark depths.
More and then than other Zwigoff films, "Fine art Schoolhouse Confidential" brims with anger. This is Zwigoff moving into bitter, Todd Solondz territory. It'southward a flick almost an art earth which is deeply competitive, in which sensationalism has superseded art, in which what constitutes "skillful art" or "whatever art" is intangible and fickle and in which sham and sincerity are difficult to gauge. Zwigoff is obsessed with the human relationship fine art has to its creators, consumers and critics, but views all three with a certain amount of contemptuousness. Critics neglect to come across, consumers fawn over celebrity and luridness and creators are driven by competitiveness, commerce, bitterness, ego and a pathological urge to connect back to or vengefully get back at lodge; to persecute others. In addition to this, all 3 groups fail to healthily divide artist/person from art/discipline. This is art as being inherently vindictive and artists existence hopelessly dysfunctional, driven by primal needs for sexual and material validation, acquisition and ownership. Similar "Crumb", Zwigoff portrays artists equally being bullied, vengeful and predisposed to self-detest, misogyny and misanthropy at best, and beingness deluded, clueless air-heads at worst. Audiences fare no better, more infatuated with serial killers and blood that anything else.
"Art School Confidential" is a good film, dark, funny and hits upon many truths, but Zwigoff's tone is unrelentingly grim and pessimistic. It's indicative of a certain postmodern trend. Information technology's no longer that the universe is "meaningless, random, absurd and stupid" and then lets resign to playfully making "films about meaningless, absurd and stupid universes" (Woody, Solondz, the Coens etc), merely that now all art or representation of such absurdities is itself an absurd gesture. In other words, we move beyond the "it'south just a joke, a game, a genre rift" of postmodernity, to an overt statement that representation itself is debased and now no longer worth it; meta-nihilism squared. "Art School Confidential" doesn't necessarily say this – information technology'due south not equally anti-art equally some claim – but it is representative of a growing tendency.
8/10 – Worth i viewing. See "Exit Through the Gift Shop", "Ghost World" and "The Shape of Things".
two out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Another misfire
Much of the problem with Art School Confidential lies with the graphic symbol of Jerome. Clowes writes graphic novels, and the main character he'due south written hither is just a cartoon figure with no depth to speak of. He falls much likewise fast from his ambition of becoming the world'southward greatest artist to someone willing to compromise his talent for the sake of coming in get-go in a higher contest. Granted, he is pliable, aping whoever he happens to be with at the moment—it'due south Bardo one moment, star alumnus Marvin Bushmiller (Adam Scott) the next— and adopting the bitter, nihilistic rantings of failed artist Jimmy (Jim Broadbent) as if those behavior were his own. This might all exist interesting if Jerome was, say, the type of troubled, seeking boy that Minghella played in Bee Season. Sadly he is not, and though Minghella is a fine actor, at that place'southward non a lot he tin can practise with what is essentially a stick figure.
That's non to say that Art School Confidential is completely worthless. Malkovich (who also produced) is very funny, and and then is Broadbent, but by and large this feels like the blazon of one-act Jerome'southward roommate Vince might someday make: overly broad, obvious, and very self- conscious. Information technology wants to be absurd, information technology wants to be hip, merely like Jerome in his quest to be the next Picasso, it's simply clueless.
66 out of 115 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Zwigoff and Clowes show Hollywood how it's done (over again)
What's fascinating about the films of Terry Zwigoff is the relativity contained within--for equally shockingly vulgar, tasteless, and not-PC a punchline can be, it is made funny because we accept seen the characters in some form in our ain lives, and ultimately empathize with their plight (the self-loathing mall Santa of "Bad Santa"; the disaffected teenage girls of "Ghost World"; the hopeless introverted romantics of "Art Schoolhouse Confidential"); instead of pointing a mocking finger and getting a laugh at someone else's expense, Zwigoff's humor hits a notation that insists "we've all been hither before, and nosotros can laugh about it." His films as well possess an underlying sincerity (and humanity) that goes unseen in the over-confident Hollywood claptrap that stinks up theaters nowadays.
"Fine art School Confidential," Zwigoff's second collaboration with cartoonist/screenwriter Daniel Clowes ("Ghost Earth") is another modest coming-of-age pic of subtle implication. The globe of Strathmore College, an art school located in the inner metropolis, is presented equally a heavily-satirized den of losers, where Jerome (Max Minghella) is looking to go, in his words, "the greatest living American creative person." He rooms with obnoxious film student Vince (Ethan Suplee), who is working on an amateur picture show about a rash of on-campus murders, naively romances pretty art model Audrey (Sophia Myles, "Underworld"), and is given tragic (still hilarious) words of wisdom by Jimmy (Jim Broadbent), a burned-out alcoholic and former student. When met with disenchantment and disappointment over the pretentious students and the professors (including John Malkovich, who does a funny reprise of his "Shadow of the Vampire" persona) who ignore his work, Jerome hatches a self-destructive plot that eventually--through ridiculous circumstances we believe anyhow--lands him in prison.
While "Fine art School Confidential" sometimes seems at the mercy of far as well many subplots, the eclectic group of art students and wayward adults are so wonderfully depicted (even if more than a few are outright bastards) they make the pic irresistible. Zwigoff's films often come off as pleasant anachronisms of cinematic technique--his lovers always bear more than in common with the stars of early cinema than their magazine-friendly counterparts; yet at the same fourth dimension, he can pull more hilarity out of a truly tasteless joke than whatever other director working today (the best become to Suplee and Joel More). Directors who try this kind of crude/sensitive residuum usually neglect--Zwigoff, however, is both in touch with his inner romantic and child. The end result of "Art Schoolhouse Confidential" is intelligent, bitingly satirical, magically romantic, and filled with irreverent hilarity.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Some other great flick of Terry Zwigoff
Warning: Spoilers
The dream and principal goal of Jerome (Max Minghella)is to be one day the greatest artist of the 21st century. The pic follows his experiences in an art schoolhouse where he volition discover that his talent every bit a painter is not the only thing that he demand to have success in the art school.
The screenplay of this slap-up picture was based on a comic book created past Daniel Clowes merely like the previous motion-picture show of Terry Zwigoff, "Ghost World" (2001). The story is unproblematic merely the outcome is very expert because the motion picture is a mix of genres, you have the typical story virtually a talented boy dealing with the adaptation in his new school with professor and students who don't like his style, the love story between Jerome and Audrey (Sophia Myles), that affects Jerome's art and terminate nearly with an obsession and besides a crime story involving a mysterious murderer. And all the stories with the archetype black humour of Terry Zwigoff's previous films makes this picture show a terrific black comedy about an art school. I really like the plough in the plot and the finish is astonishing and peradventure is a reason of the poor rating on the film because is a very night end.
And i dearest all the characters fabricated, on purpose, with a lot of clichés, i mean in that location is the classic educatee filmmaker e'er thinking about his script, the typical professor who thinks he knows everything but most of the students take more talent than him and some others that Jerome's friend explain on a terrific scene. And i really like that because this characters are not just from others films, i mean at that place are ever those kind of students in every schoolhouse ,not just in fine art schools and prove to that is that Daniel Clowes based his comic volume in his own experiences in an art school.
Well, the cast is very adept; this is the starting time fourth dimension i watch Max Minghella and Sophia Miles and both are skilful and very young. John Malhovich, who is also one of the producers, is neat in his role as Jerome'due south professor and i really similar the cameos of Angelica Huston and the great Steve Buscemi.
Conclusion: i actually like this black comedy of Terry Zwigoff, for me is not his best but is another example of why for me Terry Zwigoff is one of the bests American filmmakers working right now and all of his films are highly re-watchable for me. And if y'all don't believe me about how swell is Terry, just watch any of his films. 9.5 out of x
Region 4 DVD: is excellent, contains a lot of bonus material similar deleted scenes, the making of the motion picture and the presentation of the film at the 2006 Sundance Film Festival. And i really hope the release of the Region 4 DVD of "Ghost World".
PS: the Mexican title for the DVD is "El Arte De La Seduccion", that means "The Art of Seduction". Horrible title!
iv out of 6 constitute this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Obvious and subtle at the aforementioned fourth dimension
Warning: Spoilers
Permit's cut to the hunt: This is not Ghost Globe II - The Darker Side, nor is information technology Bad Santa Goes To @#c!in' Fine art Class, or Adaptation or Election or any other motion picture I've seen it compared to in the reviews. I personally avoid comparisons like the plague, but in this instance I can see why this is happening. The film simply feels incredibly derivative; if pressed, I would say it's more like The Dangerous Lives of Altar Boys in overall tone and the way it shifts gears mid-pic.
I nonetheless enjoyed it very much for its sheer ballsiness, the injected sad-merely-true realities regarding The Way Things Piece of work On This Planet (in art school or otherwise) and its derangedly skewed premise. Likewise laudable is the manner the movie winds up being both obvious and subtle at the same time, in so many means.
There'due south tons of irony here, also, as in any proper Zwigoff/Clowes movie. My favorite bit of it has to exist the mode poor Jerome (Max G., perfectly cast) keeps trying to get Prof. Sandiford's (Malkovich, in superb underplay mode) approval, to no avail. Even when he steals Jimmy'due south paintings, desperately hoping that Sandiford volition now appreciate 'his' darker piece of work, information technology fails - the Professor tells him, in result, "Don't worry, yous'll come out of this phase" - and here some other subtle signal is made, too ~ an creative person (of any kind) cannot practise the work for acclaim, fame or approving; it has to be done for the sheer thrill of cosmos and the deep demand to express what needs to come out from within.
iii out of 4 institute this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A Dark One-act About The Art Concern: A Biting Satire
Alarm: Spoilers
Art School Confidential (2006): Starring Max Minghella, Jon Malkovich, Jim Broadbent, Matt Keeslar, Sophia Myles, Angelica Houston, Joel Moore, Adam Scott, Jac Ong, Marsha Bell, Lauren Lee Smith, Jeremy Guskin, Jeanette Brox, Nick Swardson, Jean St. James, Paul Collins, Alexandra Ryan...Director Terry Zwigoff, Screenplay Daniel Clowes.
Manager Terry Zwigoff's "Art School Confidential" has been turning heads and sparking debates amidst film critics since it kickoff appeared in diverse film festivals. This is a brilliant dark comedy that parodies and ridicules the world of art, not excluding the movie business. Young and relatively unknown player Max Minghella stars every bit Jerome Platz, an innocent, boy-side by side-door blazon from the suburbs who dreams of condign the greatest modern creative person of the 21st century (meaning of today). He doesn't accept a girlfriend, is shy and idealistic and moves into a dorm at a prestigious art school where he encounters a closeted gay, an overweight, smart-aleck aspiring picture director and a swish, gorgeous blonde (Sophia Myles) named Audrey who becomes his Muse. But far from existence a coming-of-age story in a traditional vein, Jerome'southward journeying is i of naiveté and idealism to jaded cynicism and despair. His fine art is criticized and disliked past his colleagues, the daughter of his dreams is fatigued to his rival Jonah (Matt Keeslar) who is in reality a fraudulent, two-faced nobody. Jim Broadbent puts in a great performance as Jimmy, an older, pathetic ex-alumni of the same art school whose artwork was rejected and who was disillusioned with the art world in full general. Now he lives to drink beer and lives in squallor. Jerome's beloved of art and dreams are pure and unselfish, but he learns that to get in in the art world i has to osculation butt and sell out. John Malkovich as the art professor is some other fine performance. Angelica Houston as the art history instructor is also great. This movie has not been well-received by critics or audiences merely for the fact that the picture is ultimately non artsy and more than Hollywood in its anti-Hollywood, anti-sell-out theme. Also, the clichés and jokes are naught fresh. In the fine art school we are introduced to Goths, hippies, artsy housewives or moms, artist groupies and every aspect of the motion-picture show seems to be based on some kind of dark novel written by a disenchanted artist. The music is lovely, the cinematography is exquisite and at that place is nothing incorrect with it. Some folks merely tin can't handle the truth about some darker aspects of the art world- that it is superficial in its own style, that information technology can brand one jaded and that it's ultimately as biased as the rest of organized loftier gild.
iii out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Just Look at Me Now
Greetings again from the darkness. I don't question the chemistry of director Terry Zwigoff and writer Daniel Clowes. I enjoyed "Ghost World" and hated "Bad Santa", which I realize has a near cult following. They are main scene creators (vignettes, if yous will) but only don't seem to take the skills to make an unabridged flick flow.
Blessed with a tremendous cast including John Malkovich, Angelica Huston, Jim Broadbent and Steve Buscemi, Zwigoff continues to brow beat the audition with his perceived brilliance. This movie suffers from the weak presence of Max Minghella ("Syriana" and "Bee Flavor") who is in nearly scenes. Minghella, with his bedchamber eyes and pouty supermodel lips, has no real personality and just can't pull off either the repose moments of agony or the ha-ha outbursts of the kid who thinks the stupidity of his environment must exist a big joke.
A bright spot is Sophia Myles who has some screen presence as the art form model slash girl of his dreams whom Minghella believes he is destined to be with. Also the commentary on the art world in full general, and art schoolhouse in detail, is quite poignant. Otherwise, there are too many in your face punch lines and definitely besides much penis screen time for my tastes.
Here's hoping Zwigoff and Clowes keep at it because, although I don't agree with those who think they are great, I do believe there is potential greatness waiting to develop.
four out of 7 plant this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Entertaining just weak
This is definitely Terry Zwigoff's least successful moving-picture show, and a big disappointment in a lot of ways. But I think if yous don't await likewise much, it'south fun and has some good twists forth the way. The film follows Jerome, who goes to art school after graduation. The film'south major strengths are that information technology actually gets into the absurdity of the concept of fine art schoolhouse (I don't think many believe that i can be taught how to be an artist), and that it communicates well the feeling of not being able to succeed. It also does skillful past not making Jerome a remarkable artist himself. He'due south a talented drawer, but his stuff is largely uninteresting and unimaginative. For a while the film seems to be poking fun at more than abstract art, but and then it does pull back and smartly doesn't dismiss the more than abstract or pop art on display, though it does put forward some of the various artists' pomposities. The film plays a lot similar Ghost World, which had the same director and writer, in that it sets up all the characters every bit stereotypes then begins to reveal them as more than human being. Unfortunately, it only doesn't work virtually likewise here. In that location are a ton of other issues, also. Max Minghella, the actor who plays Jerome, is painfully dull. He looks like a model in a catalogue. The girl in whom he develops an interest is as tedious, an everyday blonde cutie who comes off as rather vapid. With these ii protagonists, a certain tiny part of the pic kept coming to mind, where ane of the very rare persons of color in the class asks their fine art history professor why they only study dead white males. Why practise we take to have these two boring, white-staff of life characters dominating the picture? Luckily, the supporting cast is very good, and includes John Malkovich (in a rather typical merely entertaining Malkovichian function), Steve Buscemi, Jim Broadbent and Joel Moore. It also includes Anjelica Huston, whom I generally don't similar. But it feels like she might have had a bigger function originally which was cut down.
4 out of vii institute this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Ultimately what we are left with is a picture that tin can be amusing at times simply is utterly forgettable
Alarm: Spoilers
Art School Confidential eight-25-08
A rather tamed beast of a moving-picture show, rather like a guard dog snipping at a guest being told constantly to conduct. Ane gets the since that the film is constantly holding dorsum, it clearly has something to say well-nigh the country of art and artists but it only never seems as poignant as it wants to exist. John Malkovitch and Angelica Huston some of films best actors are seemingly marginalized and rather boring. The fresh faces, whose names escape me, are equally uninteresting. The only highlight performance wise was the wonderful Adam Scott whose one scene proves the futility of the entire film. The filmmakers via Adam Scotts bit role manage to become all the the things they take to say out of the way in a cursory petty rant of a scene. Whats left is a tired romance and a somewhat ironic serial killer sub-plot that is but silly. Ultimately what we are left with is a picture show that tin be amusing at times but is utterly forgettable.
2 out of 2 establish this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A Twist of Lime with a Crabapple on Top
The commencement of this movie was hilarious. Jerome goes to art schoolhouse and meets zany characters, including his gay roommate, his wannabe filmmaker roommate, and his art teacher (played by John Malkovich). The dialogue was witty. The audience loved the satire of modern art, considering we all know how ridiculous modernistic fine art tin be yet we must be polite and insightful when looking at it. Anybody could relate to the perverted higher humor. Unfortunately, all this silliness ended. Right in the middle, the movie took a plow of tone and with information technology took the refreshingly simple merely fun plot.
Art School Confidential suddenly became serious nigh its characters, including the mysterious strangler. The decision to transform the movie into a serious mystery was it's major flaw. With this motion, the writers felt they had to incorporate a more confusing plot to reach a mysterious tone. Past the end, the initial idea of only amusing the audition was lost because of the poorly-crafted mystery, leaving the audience disappointed.
Why practise filmmakers do this? They call back considering we have paid to see an indie movie, we want an obscure plot twist topped off with an unresolved ending. It'south similar having ice cream, fun and simple, then someone comes over and adds a twist of lime and tops it off with crab apples! Obscure, but no fun because information technology tastes weird and you were content with the ice cream by itself. I recommend the starting time hour of this moving picture.
82 out of 139 constitute this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Did I miss something?
Warning: Spoilers
Directed by Terry Zwigoff, Fine art School Confidential is a film adaptation of a four-page comic book of the same name by Daniel Clowes (whom too wrote the screenplay) and tells the story of a struggling creative person who tries desperately to make a name for himself. Allow me starting time off past maxim that this was my 2d time viewing this motion-picture show. Upon my showtime fourth dimension watching it, it left me kinda underwhelmed for some reason. That being said, after watching it once more concluding night, I did non realize how much I actually disliked the film until having seen it said time.
My biggest gripe, if it's not already obvious, is the leading character himself, Jerome. If this guy is not the biggest stick-in-the-mud ever put onscreen, then I don't know who is. I swear that this kid had the personality of a deflating balloon. Throughout the film, he acts every bit though the entire world owes him something. Not only that, the guy comes off generally as a creepy d-bag, as he spends the majority of the film obsessing over a young female person model, just I guess that that was the bespeak? I volition go further past maxim that he and the atomic number 82 female person (that of course beingness said model) have next to no chemical science. But once again, perchance that was the signal?
Another huge gripe I have with the film is that it feels downright cluttered. First, we follow the main character through his struggles of existence overlooked through his artwork, so we follow a roommate of his who'due south dream is to become a filmmaker. Nosotros and so proceed following the master character as he desperately tries seeking the attending of the female person lead, which involves some other subplot with an FBI agent posing as an art student while stealing the main character'southward spot. Another subplot involves a mysterious killer who strangles each of his victims; there's also yet some other subplot involving a roommate of the primary character who only and so happens to exist gay and it as pointless as yous would expect.
If I have any positives to say virtually the film, it would be the supporting cast ... most of them ... or some of them. John Malkovich basically played himself, Angelica Huston was completely wasted (as was Steve Buscemi, only merely by a mile), only Jim Broadbent definitely stood out; he pretty much stole every scene that he was in. Last just non least, the grapheme that I plant to be the about interesting was the cocky filmmaker dude. From how I saw it, he had the most depth out of all the others.
This moving picture received mixed reviews upon its release and I can definitely see why. Notwithstanding, it has apparently been praised by some since then and God knows why. I've read reviews saying that it was a funny satire. First of all, aside from the scenes with Broadbent, when, where, and how exactly was information technology funny? What was even the joke? Second of all, what exactly was satirizing? Was it satirizing art school in general? Was it trying to say 'dreams come up true, whether they work out the way you want them to or not'? Or was it mocking concept involving 'dorky guy meets girl, daughter is out of his league, but that doesn't thing considering they assemble anyway'? Yeah, I'm completely lost.
To the those who actually like this movie, more power to you. But equally someone who's numerous art classes during his preteen years, I honestly cannot see the appeal, and I charge per unit information technology iii.viii/ten.
two out of ii found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Elitist Art Schoolhouse Culture Cut to Shreds
That rarest of finds: a rich, complexly layered boom of a black comedy. The main story is a savagely bitter, dark sendup of the world of art institute-based educational activity. Anyone who knows the scene at one of these elitist schools, places like the Rhode Island School of Pattern, should shriek with glee to meet all the familiar stereotypes - among students, alumni and faculty - brought vividly to life. Dandy cast, marvelous screenplay, editing and music.
The pace is fast and unpredictable. The intensity of satire hither approaches lethal levels. The ironies are sometimes deafening. Strands of romantic comedy, physical comedy and the comedy of contemporary manners besides are nicely woven throughout. Sight gags abound. As in the best of over-the-acme black comedies, people practice die. At the eye of comic darkness, afterwards all, violence and danger e'er lurk.
Veteran performers John Malkovich and Anjelica Huston (both arts kinesthesia members), Jim Broadbent (an embittered, alcoholic painter) and Steve Buscemi (a society owner who sponsors shows for aspiring talents) all shine brightly in comedic support of the principal immature romantic leads, the only 2 straight players in the moving picture: Max Minghella (Jerome, a sober, earnest beau who but wants to be the 21st Century's best painter) and Sophia Myles (Audrey, the equally serious human drawing model who steals Jerome's middle).
A clutch of lesser known actors lend vital elements to the humorous proceedings: among the best are Ethan Suplee (Vince, a manicky film educatee), Joel Moore (Bardo, Jerome's cynical sidekick), Adam Scott (Marvin Bushmiller, the successful, vainglorious alum), and Jack Ong (Professor Okamura, a sourpuss fine art teacher).
People who are unfamiliar with the world of elitist fine art pedagogy may not capeesh this picture. I had a very close acquaintance who did his MFA at RISD, and the slant here absolutely nails his experiences and stories. For me, this is Zwigoff's best work since "Crumb." I also seem to be amidst a minority who recall it is fashion better than "Ghost World," the outset collaboration between Zwigoff and graphic comic author Daniel Clowes, who wrote the screenplays for "GW" and "Art School Confidential." If you liked Peter Chelsom's "Funny Basic" or Emir Kusturica's "Underground," chances are you'll like this film too. But then lots of folks won't. My grade: A- nine/10.
three out of 4 plant this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Dumb moving-picture show dressed upward as high brow...
Reading the blurb on the back and seeing the managing director responsible and the cast for this film I expected something much meliorate.
We saw bad Santa and idea it was great fun. This film should take delivered something entertaining, something quirky and original. I don't see 'indie' to see unsmart, anticipated films that make me fast forward the concluding 20 minutes while groaning in utter atheism at the awful, awful film I paid practiced money to come across.
Malkovich is OK, like a warm moisture flannel. But he doesn't save this BLAND & PASTY moving picture.
Lead grapheme glares and pouts his mode through the entire moving picture, perhaps he attended the Roger Moore/Freddie Prinz.Jr School of Facial Interim. Who knows!? All nosotros know is nosotros never desire to see his face up over again ever.
See Bad Santa and avert this lemon unless you are feeling mentally diminished.
2 out of ii found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Source: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0364955/reviews